Legal Opinion

Priesman v. Meridian Mutual Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1992No. 89357, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question presented is whether an underage, unlicensed driver injured while driving his mother’s automobile without her knowledge or consent may recover medical benefits from the no-fault insurer of her automobile. We agree with the Court of Appeals that he is entitled to recover no-fault medical benefits, and affirm.

*62I

Renee Priesman owned an automobile insured by Meridian Mutual Insurance Company. Her son, Corey Warfield, who was fourteen years old, took the automobile without her permission during the nighttime while she was sleeping. Corey picked up friends, was involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shoreham-Wading River Central School District v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Priesman v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Gross v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Amerisure Insurance v. PlumbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Butterworth Hospital v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Roberts v. TITAN INS. CO.(ON RECON.)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API