Legal Opinion
Roberts v. TITAN INS. CO.(ON RECON.)
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 2009No. Docket 280776PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON RECONSIDERATION
Before: HOEKSTRA, EJ., and WHITBECK and Talbot, JJ. Fer CURIAM.
In this first-party no-fault automobile insurance action, plaintiff Kyle Roberts, by his next friend and mother, Lillian Irwin, appealed as of right the trial court’s order granting defendant Titan Insurance Company (Titan) summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). In our opinion issued December 4, 2008, we reversed but stated that, were it not for the *342statements in the lead opinion in Priesman v Meridian Mut Ins Co1 that were adopted by this Court in Butter-worth Hosp v Farm Bureau Ins Co,2 we would have…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Corwin v. DaimlerChrysler InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Comerica Bank v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Titan Insurance v. HytenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.