In Re the Shaheen Trust
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Twinkle Shaheen appeals from the trial court’s judgment refusing to apply a forfeiture provision of the Shaheen Trust against Catherine “Pearl” Roberts and her son, George Roberts (collectively “the Roberts-es”), after they alleged breach of trust against Shaheen. For the following reasons, we reverse in part and remand.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 The Shaheen Trust was established in 1994, with Shaheen as the trustee. The trust included a no-eontest provision, stating:
If any beneficiary under this Trust, in any manner, directly or indirectly,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Estate of Shumway v. GavetteArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Ghadimi v. SorayaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Martinets v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wulf v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017