Legal Opinion

Palmer & Rey v. Marysville Democrat Publishing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1891No. 14069PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

— This is an-action to recover possession of a certain printing-press delivered by plaintiffs' assignors to one McWhorter, under a contract similar in terms to that which was under consideration in the case of Palmer v. Howard, 72 Cal. 293; 1 Am. St. Rep. 60.

When the plaintiffs rested at the trial, the defendant moved the court for a nonsuit, upon several grounds. The motion was granted, and the only question for consideration is, whether the court erred in its ruling.

*169McWhorter sold the property to Holland & Crane, and they had full notice of the terms-and conditions under which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Smalley v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Inderbitzen v. Lane HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API