Legal Opinion

Cozad v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 16, 1990No. CR 90-21PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant was charged under the rape statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-103 (1987), with engaging in deviate sexual activity with a person under fourteen years of age. The victim is the daughter of Cathy Lewellyn, who held herself out to be Cozad’s wife at the time of the crime. Appellant was convicted of rape and sentenced as a habitual offender to forty years imprisonment.

In his appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his asserted privilege under Ark. Code Ann. § 17-39-107 (1987) involving a conversation he had with a certified licensed social…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Cogburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Simmons First National Bank v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Donoho v. DonohoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Board of Trustees v. StodolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Vickers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Omega Tube & Conduit Corp. v. MaplesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API