Legal Opinion

Cushing v. Meehan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Appellants assert the following propositions : (1) There is no credible evidence to support the finding that the cab was making a stop; (2) there is none to support the finding that the stopping was in violation of the statute; (3) there is none to support the finding that the place of stopping was a cause of the collision; (4) the negligence of Meehan was an intervening cause. We cannot agree.(1) Evidence that the cab was making a stop. John King-died before the trial. Mrs. Cushing and Meehan testified. Without reciting the testimony in detail, it suffices to say that both testified that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ryan v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Jeffers v. Peoria-Rockford Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wittig v. KeplerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poole v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Poole v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API