Wittig v. Kepler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The appeal challenges only the finding that the negligence of the bus driver was not causal. On such an appeal the appellate court must adopt that view of conflicting testimony and the inferences reasonably to be drawn from the evidence which best support the finding under attack. If there is credible evidence to support the finding it should not be disturbed. Bush v. Mahlkuch (1956), 272 Wis. 246, 248, 75 N. W. (2d) 283; Pedek v. Wegemann, ante, p. 57, 81 N. W. (2d) 49.
Respondent corporation does not contend that the bus driver drove onto the right shoulder of the highway before stopping.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bush v. MahlkuchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Pedek v. WegemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheryn Kautz Fietzer and Oward Kautz v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Cushing v. MeehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959