Legal Opinion

Delap v. Parcell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On June 5, 1930, appellant, Kirshner, entered into a land contract with the defendants, Robert E. Parcell and wife, for the sale of certain premises for an agreed consideration of $7,500. The Parcells agreed to pay $50 a month during the first year, $60 a month during the second year, and $100 a month during the third year. Payments under the land contract commenced on June 15, 1930. The contract further provided that at the end of the three-year period, when the sum of $2,520 had been paid, Kirshner agreed to deed the premises in question to Parcell and wife and take back a purchase-money…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mitchell Realty Co. v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ely v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Pier v. Fond du Lac CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Warren Webster & Co. v. Beaumont Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Spear v. Door CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sid Grinker Co. v. CraigheadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Else v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Christensen v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  4. Pennsylvania Oil Co. v. AndrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. United States v. EarlingDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API