Else v. Cannon
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
Plaintiff contends that when the purchasers surrendered their equitable interest in the real estate to the vendors, the holders of the legal title, a merger resulted, and that in this action to foreclose his lien he may reach both interests and require their sale for satisfaction of his claim.
The question presented is dealt with in two prior decisions of this court. Milwaukee Loan & Finance Co. v. Grundt, 207 Wis. 506, 242 N. W. 131, and Delap v. Parcell, 230 Wis. 152, 283 N. W. 305. The facts appearing in those cases are quite similar to those considered here. Out of these earlier cases we…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Delap v. ParcellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Milwaukee Loan & Finance Co. v. GrundtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Peters v. BossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Republic Bank of Chicago v. LichosytCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- C. R. Stocks, Inc. v. Blakely's Matterhorn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- C. R. Stocks, Inc. v. Blakely's Matterhorn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Republic Bank of Chicago v. LichosytCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Republic Bank of Chicago v. LichosytCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007