Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Oil Co. v. Andrew

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 7, 1939:

Martin, J.

The plaintiff’s first cause of action is in equity for the purpose of restraining the defendant Andrew from further breaching the contract set out in the foregoing statement of facts. The second cause of action is one at law to recover liquidated damages for past breach of the same contract. That a cause of action in equity and an action at law may be joined is provided for by statute. Sec. 263.04, Stats., provides:

“The plaintiff may unite in the same complaint several causes of action, whether they be such as were formerly…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. WirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Bradshaw v. . MillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Combs v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McLennan v. ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simenstad v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API