O. F. Haley Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Murray County Court; Harry W. Fielding, Judge. Upon the seizure of a quantity of intoxicating liquors under a search warrant, the O. E. ITaley Company interpleads, claiming the liquor. From a judgment overruling the interplea, the O. F. Haley Company brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
On September 17, 1909, in the town of Sulphur, Murray county, a large quantity of whisky and beer was seized, while in the railroad depot, under a search warrant issued by the county judge of that county, in pursuance of the enforcement act (Comp. Laws 1909, sec. 4184).
At the hearing of the return to the writ, under section 4185, Comp. Laws 1909, the plaintiff in error claimed the liquors seized under the writ, in a formal pleading in the nature of an interplea, which, omitting caption, follows:
“Comes now O. F. Haley Co. and respectfully represents and shows to the court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ex Parte Webb.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hanauer v. DoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Heyman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Klein v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Friedman & Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cooke County Liquor Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.