Friedman & Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Pottawatomie County Court; Ross F. Loclcridge, Judge. Seizure by the state of Oklahoma of certain whisky, and Friedman & Co., petition to interplead. Petition denied,' and from a judgment of confiscation Friedman & Co. bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
Forty-eight cases of whisky were seized by the sheriff of Pottawatomie county under a seatrch and seizure warrant in the railroad freighthouse in the city of Shawnee. Friedman & Co. came into the case by interplea and claimed the whisky, and demanded a return thereof, on the ground that it was an undelivered interstate shipment, and that as such it was, at the time of seizure, not subject to the police power of the state. Upon a trial before the county judge the prayer of the interpleader was denied; the court finding from the agreed facts and other evidence that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Heyman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Adams Express Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Blunk v. WaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. Eighteen Casks of BeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bristow Cotton Oil Co. v. Hubbell, Slack & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924