Wakefield v. Sunday Lake Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gogebic. (Daboll, J., presiding.) Bill to declare a forfeiture of a mining lease. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Complainants, residents of Milwaukee, Wis., are owners of certain mining lands in Gogebic county, in the State of Michigan, of which defendant is the lessee. The lease is recorded, and complainants are in possession, and file this bill to quiet title, and enjoin the defendant company, organized under the laws of Wisconsin, and whose officers reside in Milwaukee, from interfering with complainants’ possession.
The complainants, on September 28, 1883, executed and delivered to N. D. Moore and S. S. Vaughn a lease for 30 years of certain lahds, by the terms of which the lessees were to mine ore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Palmer v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- White v. LeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1880
- Cheney v. BonnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Farmer v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- De Grasse v. Verona Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- McPheeters v. BirkholzMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Hersey Gravel Co. v. Crescent Gravel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Ammendale Normal Institute, Inc. v. Schrom Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- City of Mt. Clemens v. Mt. Clemens Sanitarium Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.