Ammendale Normal Institute, Inc. v. Schrom Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
A property owner here complains because a party was permitted to continue to remove sand and gravel from the owner’s property after bringing to date royalty payments which had been in arrears. We conclude that the chancellor properly denied injunctive relief, but gave the wrong reasons for that denial.
Appellant, Ammendale Normal Institute, Inc. (Ammendale) , a religious facility conducted by the “Christian Brothers,” entered into a written agreement in 1963 with appellee, Schrom Construction, Inc. (Schrom), under which Schrom was “to mine sand and/or gravel” from the land of Ammendale, paying…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. VanderbiltIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Beckwith v. RossiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- McGrath v. GegnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Bleecker v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Campbell v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chertkof v. Southland Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Rose & Crown, Ltd. v. Shaw Enterprises, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Goss v. C.A.N. Wildlife Trust, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.