Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Hunter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Midland. Forcible Entry and Detainer. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Hunter complained, before a justice of the peace, of Farmer and Driscoll of peaceably entering and forcibly detaining his premises. He prevailed both before the justice and on appeal, where the circuit judge refused to *338allow the defendants to show a right to the land and directed a verdict for plaintiff.

On the trial plaintiff showed acts of force in keeping him out. He also undertook to show that the contest arose on occasion of his attempt to re-enter on a terminated lease. He seems to have claimed that respondents got in collusively by arrangement with his outgoing tenant.

But they…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peters v. HolderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Marsh v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wakefield v. Sunday Lake Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Livingston v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  5. Torrey v. BerkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API