Legal Opinion

Clifton A. Little Ii Et Ano, V. Hardie-tynes Co. Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 25, 2025No. 86318-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CLIFTON A. LITTLE, II and FANNIE M. LITTLE, husband and wife, No. 86318-5-I Respondents, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION HARDIE-TYNES CO., INC., Appellant. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as successor-by- merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.; A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY; BW/IP, INC., f/k/a BORG-WARNER INDUSTRAIL PRODUCTS, successor- in-interest to BYRON JACKSON PUMPS; COPES-VULCAN, INC.; FOSTER WHEELER LLC; FRASER’S BOILER SERIVCE, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor-in-interest to DE LAVAL TURBINE,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Munich v. Skagit Emergency Communications CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API