Munich v. Skagit Emergency Communications Center
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 This case involves the special relationship exception to the public duty doctrine. One of the elements necessary to satisfy the special relationship exception requires an express assurance by the defendant. The plaintiff in this case alleges a 911 operator negligently responded to an emergency call by coding (or prioritizing) it incorrectly, thereby causing a delayed response. The operator correctly informed the caller help was on the way, though the operator made no time estimate or reference to the call’s priority.
¶2 On summary judgment, the defendant argued express assurances must be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Meaney v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Beltran-Serrano v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Gorman v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Shizuko Mita v. Guardsmark, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.