Chomko v. Patmon
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This appeal is a sequel to our recent decision in Chomko v. Patmon, 19 Conn. App. 483, 563 A.2d 311 (1989) (Chomko I). In Chomko I, which was a summary process action based on nonpayment of rent, we found no error in the trial court’s determination that the plaintiff had failed to establish a landlord-tenant relationship between him and the defendants regarding the condominium in question, and that, therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to a judgment of possession by way of a summary process action. The basis of our decision was the abundant evidence, on which the trial court was entitled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Salem Park, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Chomko v. PatmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Tucker v. Pace Investments AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. SinclairConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Housatonic Corporate Centre Associates Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.