Legal Opinion
Gagnon v. Planning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 9, 1991No. 8757PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered dismissing her appeal from the approval by the defendant city planning commission of Bristol (commission) of the application of the defendants, Jon Pose, James Sessions, Dominic Pietrofesa and Josephine Pietrofesa (applicants) for a subdivision allowing two parcels of land on Shrub Road to be divided into eighteen single-family building lots. The court, because the *415applicants were subsequently granted an application for a resubdivision from which no appeal was taken, dismissed her appeal as moot. We affirm the dismissal.
Early in June, 1988, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Moscowitz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- R. B. Kent & Son, Inc. v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Oak Leaf Marina, Inc. v. ErtelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Schallenkamp v. DelponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Alca Construction Co. v. Waterbury Housing AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Daly v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.