Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Pace Investments Associates

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 10, 1993No. 11303PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

The plaintiff, Stanley V. Tucker, appeals from the judgment dismissing his civil rights claim against the defendants and from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants with respect to his claim of abuse of process. The disposi-*385tive issue in this appeal is whether the doctrine of res judicata provides a basis on which we can affirm the trial court’s judgment. Because res judicata operates to bar Tucker’s civil rights claim and his abuse of process claim, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are not in dispute. The long and tortured history of this case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Virgo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lighthouse Landings, Inc. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. OsuchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. In Re EberhartConnecticut Superior Court · 2002
  4. Tucker v. Pace InvestmentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Milford v. Andresakis, No. Cv94 0047124s (Apr. 7, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API