Legal Opinion

State v. Urvan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1982No. 43612PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal by defendant-appellant, Steven Urvan (defendant), from the refusal to dismiss a charge of grand theft. The ground for the motion was double jeopardy.

The judgment is reversed and the defendant discharged.

I

A

In June 1979, Woodhill Permatex Corporation, 18731 Cranwood Parkway, Warrensville Heights, Ohio (Permatex), contacted the Warrensville Heights Police Department about the internal thefts of its products. Two months later, William Strawbridge of Bonaventure Corp. (Bonaventure) was hired by Permatex to investigate the thefts. By Labor Day weekend, Strawbridge had narrowed his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BeukeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ClellandOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State v. BillingsleyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. McSorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API