Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1998No. 16281PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frederick N. Young, Presiding Judge.

The state of Ohio appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court dismissing two counts of a five-count indictment against appellee John Oliver Barnett.

The state advances three assignments of error. First, it contends that the trial court erred by relying upon State v. Urvan (1982), 4 Ohio App.3d 151, 4 OBR 244, 446 N.E.2d 1161, and finding that a prosecutor in one county can plea bargain with a defendant and prevent prosecution in another county for a separate offense. The state also claims that the trial court erred by ruling that a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. William Eugene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  2. State v. NeviusOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. United States v. George IngramCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. MathewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. ClellandOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BillingsleyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Saint Paris v. GalluzzoOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API