Legal Opinion
Yhudai v. Impac Funding Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 2016No. B262509PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, P. J.
Appellant Moshe Yhudai sued his lender and other parties alleging causes of action arising from the nonjudicial foreclosure sale of his residence. The trial court sustained the respondents’ demurrer to Yhudai’s second amended complaint without leave to amend and entered a judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. Yhudai appealed. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Yhudai owned a residence in Los Angeles. In February 2007 he borrowed $1,802,500 from Impac Funding, and secured the loan with a deed of trust against the residence. Impac Funding is named as the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Rajamin v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mendoza v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- David Turner v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Tepper v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Alice Lopez v. JPMorgan Chase & CoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Myles v. Pennymac Loan ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.