Legal Opinion

Stiebel v. Roberts

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1941No. Civ. No. 11542PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCEJ.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judg- ment in favor of the defendants and also in favor of the interveners.

Plaintiffs are some of the beneficiaries under the will of Charles H. Roberts, deceased. Defendant Elizabeth Clare Roberts is the widow of said deceased and a beneficiary under said will. Defendants Charles Sims and Earl J. Wherry are also beneficiaries under said will and were named as defendants because of their refusal to join with plaintiffs in prosecuting this action. Defendant C. S. Price is an attorney at law who acted as attorney for the executrices. executrices.

*436Pla…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fealey v. FealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kearney v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. San Francisco Protestant Orphan Asylum v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. IMO Development Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Estate of ClausseniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Horney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API