Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Co. v. Moorhead Knitting Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by the Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Company against the Moorhead Knitting Company.
1Opinion of the Court
WITMER, District Judge.
The defendant is charged with infringement of two patents granted to George Collis — the. one, No. 1,114,966, dated October 27, 1914; the other, an alleged• divisional thereof, No. 1,204,945, dated November 14, 1916. The first patent covers an apparatus for drying and shaping hosiery and the like, consisting of an internally steam-heated metal hosiery form, being narrow relatively to its width, and having its opposite narrow edges substantially sharpened. The second patent is for improvements in the art of finishing and shaping hosieiy, in connection with the use of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Busch v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Reeves v. CorningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1892
- American Lava Co. v. StewardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crom v. Cement Gun Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- Mills Alloys, Inc. v. Stoody Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937
- Paramount Textile Machinery Co. v. Ipswich MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925