Legal Opinion

Paramount Textile Machinery Co. v. Ipswich Mills

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 7, 1925No. 1809Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement case the defendant prevailed in the court below. The patent, No. 1,-207,494, issued on December 5, 1916, on an application filed May 2, 1913, covers an apparatus for drying and shaping stoekings. Stockings are first knit, then bleached and dyed, then put into a “whizzer,” wMeh takes out a large percentage of the water. The *573next stage, formerly, was to stretch them upon a board, foot and leg shaped; thenee they were put into a drier; when dried, they were pressed,-and then packed for shipment.

Many years ago the drying and shaping art was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Co. v. Moorhead Knitting Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Co. v. Moorhead Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API