State v. Pejsa
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.
Donald J. Pejsa, Jr., appeals from various felony convictions. He raises issues concerning venue, the taping of incriminating statements, sufficiency of the evidence, and sentencing. We affirm.
At the times material to this case, Michael and Beth Bo-hannon were husband and wife. In 1990, however, they separated. In May, Beth began a liaison with Donald Pejsa. By August, Beth’s relationship with Pejsa was at an end, and she had reconciled with Michael.
After Beth and Michael were back together, Pejsa began threatening Beth by saying he would tell Michael of their "activities” unless Beth…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- People v. Treier, New York County Courts1995
- West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
- State v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.