Legal Opinion

Minger v. Reinhard Distributing Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 1997No. 15627-3-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

We are asked to decide these issues in this sexual harassment case: (1) whether jury answers to special interrogatories are inconsistent; (2) whether the plaintiffs/employees are prevailing parties for the purpose of awarding attorney fees, and if so, whether the amount was correctly determined; (3) whether the trial court erred in not granting a new trial on the issue of general damages; (4) whether the defendant/employer’s offer of judgment under CR 68 was properly considered by the trial court; and (5) whether either party is entitled to attorney fees on appeal.

We determine the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Blair v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Browning v. Slenderella Systems of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Donna Crossman v. Michael MarcoccioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McClarty v. Totem Elec.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. McClarty v. Totem ElectricWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Estate of Dormaier v. Columbia Basin Anesthesia, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Rebecca A. Rufin, Appellant, v. the City of Seattle, RespondentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. People v. RailColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API