Legal Opinion

Rebecca A. Rufin, Appellant, v. the City of Seattle, Respondent

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 26, 2017No. 74825-4-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.

¶1 An agency must respond to a Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, request within five days by providing the records, denying the request, or sending a letter estimating the date of production. Rebecca Rufin challenges the city of Seattle’s (City) response to three of her PRA requests, arguing that records were delayed or the search was inadequate. We conclude that with respect to one of those requests, the trial court erred in finding no PRA violation because the City failed to give Rufin a five-day letter with a reasonable estimate of production. We also conclude that the trial…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Freedom Foundation v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Kittitas Cnty. v. AllphinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Andrea Cantu v. Yakima School District No. 7Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  4. Brian Cortland v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Carlos Benitez, Jr. v. Skagit CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API