Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 11, 1947No. C. D. 1060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a protest arising at the port of Buffalo against the collector’s assessment of duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 774 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on certain shipments of fresh rhubarb imported from Canada. The protest claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 35 per centum under paragraph 752, or free of duty under paragraph 1722, or dutiable at 10 per centum under paragraph 1558. Plaintiff relies chiefly, however, on paragraph 752.

The competing provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Par. 774. Vegetables in their natural state: * * *…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. WallaceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Western Fruit Distributers v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API