Legal Opinion

Lozier v. Brown Company

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 23, 1981No. 80-075PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue in this case is whether RSA 556:11 or RSA 281:12 (Supp. 1979) bars the plaintiffs action. We hold that neither statute bars the action.

The plaintiff is the administratrix of the estate of her husband, Leo Lozier. On April 29, 1966, Lozier was injured during the course of his employment for the defendant corporation. From that date until his death on November 5, 1977, he received workmen’s compensation benefits for this injury, and, because of RSA 281:12 (Supp. 1979), he could have no claim against this defendant. Alleging that her husband’s death was the result of the injury, Mrs.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Poliquin v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
  2. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Burke v. BurnhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  4. Ham v. Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  5. Hebert v. HebertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morgenroth & Associates, Inc. v. Town of TiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Coffey v. BresnahanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Gelinas v. MacKeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Trovato v. DeveauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API