Legal Opinion
In re Goldman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 2, 2005No. 2004-241PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C. J.
This case comes before us on an interlocutory transfer without ruling. Sup. Ct. R. 9. The Superior Court (Coffey, J.) submits for our resolution the following question:
Does the Amendment of RSA 458:17 preclude the Court from considering contribution of college educational expenses for an adult child when the Motion [for college contributions] was filed prior to the enactment of the Amendment but the hearing was scheduled after the effective date of the Amendment?
We respond in the affirmative.
The petitioner, Robert L. Goldman, and the respondent, Mary E. (Goldman) Elliott, were divorced in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. RichardelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Woart v. WinnickSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1826
- LeClair v. LeClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- New Hampshire Health Care Ass'n v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Tuttle v. New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. FournierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.