Legal Opinion

Burke v. Burnham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 4, 1951No. 4058PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The defendant’s exception presents the issue of whether a settlement made by the plaintiff’s decedent during her lifetime was as a matter of law a satisfaction of damages recoverable in this action, constituting a bar to its maintenance. Since the settlement exceeded the limit of $7,000 placed by statute upon recovery in actions for resulting death (R. L., c. 355, s. 13), the defendant asserts that the plaintiff can have no right of recovery.

There appears to be no dispute that the defendant’s liability is that of a joint tort feasor, the other tort feasor 'having been the person with whom the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson Benedict Co. v. SeversonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Carbary v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. McLaughlin v. Hebron Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1909

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Cyrenus Couture, Adm. Estate of Richard Couture v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. R. Hoe & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Rumford Printing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Archie v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API