Legal Opinion

Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 2008No. A07-2034PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

On appeal from the district court’s order entering default judgment against them and order denying their motion to vacate the default judgment, appellants Wilson McShane Corporation, as Administrator for the Twin Cities Carpenters and Joiners Pension Fund, and the Twin Cities Carpenters and Joiners Pension Fund argue (1) the district court, as a state court, did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to decide whether a domestic relations order (DRO) is a “qualified” domestic relations order (QDRO) for the purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Elizabeth L. Rouse v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation Uaw Non-Contributory PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Geiger v. Foley Hoag LLP Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Vera Mae Hopkins v. At & T Global Information Solutions Company, Formerly Known as Ncr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API