Legal Opinion
John a Hammock v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 28, 2003No. 02-6126PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERTIFICATION OF STATE LAW QUESTIONS
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, on its own motion pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 27.1 and Okla. Stat. tit. 20, §§ 1601-1611, hereby certifies to the Oklahoma Supreme Court the following unsettled questions of state law which may determine the outcome of the above-captioned action pending before this court:
1. Does a vendor of merchandise qualify as an “independent contractor” for the retailers it supplies, within the meaning of Okla. Stat. tit. 85, § 11, such that a retailer may potentially assume workers’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Rance v. Harrison Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Terry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Randall v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Connie Randall, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Life and Casualty Company, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Third-Party v. The Estate of Richard D. Randall, Sr., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006