Legal Opinion

Randall v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2006No. 04-5031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF STATE LAW

LUCERO, Presiding Judge.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, on its own motion pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 27.1 and Okla. Stat. tit. 20, §§ 1601-1611, hereby certifies to the Oklahoma Supreme Court the following unsettled questions of state law, which may determine the outcome of the above-captioned action pending before this court:

1. Does the principle, articulated in Alkire v. King, 183 Okla. 187, 80 P.2d 309 (1938), that the assignment of a life insurance policy conveys to the assignee a right to the proceeds even though the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re KaufmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Chartrand v. ChartrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa v. ABC Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Alkire v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. John a Hammock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connie Randall, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Life and Casualty Company, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Third-Party v. The Estate of Richard D. Randall, Sr., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API