Legal Opinion

County of Sarpy v. City of Gretna

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2004No. S-02-1473PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

The City of Gretna sits entirely within the borders of Sarpy County, Nebraska. Pursuant to two municipal ordinances, Gretna purported to annex sections of two state highways which extend from Gretna’s borders. Sarpy County filed suit, claiming that Gretna was without authority to annex the land. The district court determined that Sarpy County lacked standing to bring the action and sustained Gretna’s demurrer. The question on appeal is whether Sarpy County has standing to contest the allegedly unlawful annexations.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Sarpy County is a political subdivision located…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harrison County v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Arthur v. Microsoft Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wagner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. City and County of Denver v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Marcuzzo v. Bank of the WestNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. County of Sarpy v. City of GretnaNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Spring Valley IV Joint Venture v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Waste Connections of Nebraska, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API