Legal Opinion

Wall v. Huguenin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 1990No. 1463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

In this action to quiet title the circuit court confirmed the special referee’s findings that Wall owns the roads and a duck pond on property he had purchased from the Huguenin family. The Huguenin family also appeals the circuit court’s confirmation 1 of the special referee’s finding that laches barred them from enforcing an option to purchase a portion of the property. We affirm.

During the period 1972-74, Harold Wall and his brothers 2 acquired three tracts of land from Edward P. Huguenin, the father of the appellants. The tracts consisted of 193 acres, 530 acres, and 112…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Glasgow v. GlasgowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Moody v. McLellanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Ex Parte Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Wayburn v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbia (SC) Teachers Federal Credit Union v. Newsome Chevrolet-BuickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Wall v. HugueninSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API