Legal Opinion

Wall v. Huguenin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 24, 1991No. 23423PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision holding that Petitioners are barred by laches from exercising an option to repurchase property from Respondent. We reverse.

FACTS

Edward P. Huguenin, Jr., deceased father of Petitioners, was owner of an 825 acre tract known as Roseland Plantation, property which had been in the Huguenin family since 1780.

Following a successful career, which included service as Superintendent of Education, Major in the National Guard and service of four years in the General Assembly, he became an alcoholic. Beset by financial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hallums v. HallumsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Lindler v. AdcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Gray v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. F. Gregorie & Son v. HamlinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Wall v. HugueninCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. HartoughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API