Wayburn v. Smith
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
This action was brought by plaintiff-respondent Mable T. Wayburn against James M. Smith for specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real estate. Smith’s answer alleged that Wayburn did not have fee simple title to the property by reason of the provisions of a deed from W. J. Wooten to Allie Walker, Wayburn’s predecessor in title. The remaining defendants were either joined or moved to intervene on the grounds that they might have an interest in the property which is the subject of the action.
By’ order of the lower court the matter was referred to the Master…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMichael v. McMichaelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Cresswell v. Bank of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Chavis v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- County of Abbeville v. KnoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Bean v. BeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Gardner v. MozingoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Hunt v. South Carolina Forestry CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- K & a Acquisition Group, LLC v. Island Pointe, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.