City of Asheville v. Herbert
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtYaesee, J.
The controversy is restricted to the question whether the city of Asheville can make a valid private sale of this land. It is admitted that 0. S., 2688, has.not been complied with. The charter of plaintiff city is set out in Private Laws 1923, ch. 16, and in sec. 1 thereof, among its enumerated corporate powers is the power to acquire and hold “all such property, real and personal as may be devised, bequeathed or in any manner conveyed to it, and may invest, sell or dispose of same.” This charter of the plaintiff is a reenactment and a consolidation of its charters of Public Laws 1883, ch.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Barnett v. DenisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Winchester v. RedmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Jeremiah M. Kesler v. . William A. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Quality Built Homes Inc. v. Town of CarthageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Greene v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Madry v. Town of Scotland NeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.