Legal Opinion

Bradpiece v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1974No. L.A. 30137Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Cal.3d 742 (1974)

518 P.2d 337

111 Cal. Rptr. 905

SIDNEY BRADPIECE, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 30137.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 6, 1974.

COUNSEL

Clarence S. Hunt for Petitioner.

F. LaMar Forshee, Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1959. He has no prior record of discipline. In August of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Demain v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API