Legal Opinion

Porter v. Goudzwaard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Replevin by Edwin E. Porter against Louis Goudzwaard. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Albert H. Vohlers,.for some time prior to December 27,1907, kept a liquor saloon in Grand Rapids, and owned and had therein a stock of liquors and other things, the ordinary outfit of a liquor saloon, except the bar fixtures and certain furniture, which belonged to the Schlitz Brewing Company and which are not involved in this cause. On September 30, 1907, Mr. McGann became the accommodation indorser for Mr. Yohlers on a promissory note for $150, payable to and at the National City Bank of Grand Rapids, due in 90 days. On December 27,1907, Mr. Yohlers sold to Mr. Porter for a consideration,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bond v. MarkstrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Rust v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Booker v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Frank v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API