Legal Opinion

King v. City of Parsons

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1915No. 19,289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Labette district court; Elmer C. Clark, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

Plaintiff sued the city claiming that she had been injured by falling on a defective sidewalk. The court sustained a demurrer to her evidence and gave judgment in favor of the city. Plaintiff appeals.

A number of reasons are advanced by the defendant in support of the ruling upon the demurrer, but from our view only one of them warrants extended comment. *655The statute (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 870) requires that before such an action can be maintained a statement in writing shall be “filed with the city clerk” within four months after the injury,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Acker v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bruce ex rel. Bruce v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Ford v. City of KinsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Bentley v. GunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Wilhite v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API