Legal Opinion

Ford v. City of Kinsley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1935No. 32,259PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff in falling on the sidewalk of a city street.

The locus in quo was as follows: Sixth street is the principal thoroughfare in the city of Kinsley. It runs east and west. On the south side of the street is a sidewalk whose width is not shown. Fronting the north, on the south side of the street and sidewalk, is *878a business establishment known as Weinelt’s Variety Store. The sidewalk was constructed, in part, of cement blocks about three feet square, and bordered by a curbing on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beltz v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Terry v. . Village of PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Weisse v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gorges v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Jackson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Elstun v. Spangles, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Pierce v. JilkaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Moore v. WinnigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API