Holbrook v. Master Protection Corp.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Associate Presiding Judge:
Briefly stated, the several issues on appeal here arise from a contractual relationship between the parties established pursuant to several related agreements. The franchisor, defendant Master Protection Corporation, a California corporation doing business as Firemaster (“Firemaster”), appeals from several adverse or allegedly inconsistent verdicts rendered at the conclusion of a jury trial. The franchisee, plaintiff Bard Hol-brook, cross-appeals from the trial court’s decision dismissing Holbrook’s racketeering claim and awarding attorney fees to Fire-master…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Carlton v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- American Rural Cellular, Inc. v. System Communication Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Coalville City v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- Anderson v. DomsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.