Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Master Protection Corp.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 30, 1994No. 920216-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Associate Presiding Judge:

Briefly stated, the several issues on appeal here arise from a contractual relationship between the parties established pursuant to several related agreements. The franchisor, defendant Master Protection Corporation, a California corporation doing business as Firemaster (“Firemaster”), appeals from several adverse or allegedly inconsistent verdicts rendered at the conclusion of a jury trial. The franchisee, plaintiff Bard Hol-brook, cross-appeals from the trial court’s decision dismissing Holbrook’s racketeering claim and awarding attorney fees to Fire-master…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Carlton v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. American Rural Cellular, Inc. v. System Communication Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  4. Coalville City v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. Anderson v. DomsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API