Legal Opinion

MILLER PONTIAC, INC. v. Osborne

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1981No. 16847PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

This is an appeal by Defendant Janet Osborne from a judgment against her and in favor of Plaintiff Miller Pontiac, Inc., entered by the Third District Court after a trial to the Court sitting without a jury. All statutory references are to Utah Code Ann., 1953, as amended.

Defendant signed a contract for the purchase of an automobile from plaintiff for her son. The car was described as “hot,” meaning that the engine and suspension had been modified to increase the car’s speed and maneuverability. The price for the car was $9,933.00 which, when increased by the cost of various…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reliable Electric Co. v. Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Crain Brothers, Inc., a Corporation v. Duquesne Slag Products Company, a Corporation, Duquesne Sand Company, a Corporation v. Duquesne Slag Products Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Keller v. Deseret Mortuary CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Griffiths v. HammonUtah Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API