Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Hinkle

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1995No. 94-869PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Plaintiff Hinkle filed a breach of warranty suit against defendant Crossland. Defendant Cross-land answered and filed a third-party complaint against third-party defendant Reeves. Crossland, in his third-party complaint, alleged that he purchased the automobiles from third-party defendant Reeves, and if there were a breach of warranty, he was entitled to indemnity from Reeves.

Plaintiff Hinkle then filed a complaint for breach of warranty directly against third-party defendant Reeves. Service of process was perfected, but Reeves failed to answer. Even though in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Osca, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Davis v. Wausau Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Cortese v. Atlantic RichfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howard v. Dallas Morning News, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Hambay v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Reeves v. HinkleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Stratton v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API