Reeves v. Hinkle
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
This is the second time this matter has been before us. In the first appeal, we dismissed under Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b), owing to unresolved claims among the parties and the failure of the abstract to include an order which set forth facts warranting an intermediate appeal. Reeves v. Hinkle, 321 Ark. 28, 899 S.W.2d 841 (1995) (Reeves I). Appellant Danny Reeves now raises the same issues in his second appeal: error in the trial court’s grant of a default judgment on liability and summary judgment on damages. We affirm for failure to comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(6).
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kohlenberger, Inc. v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Divelbliss v. SuchorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Stacks v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Arnold & Arnold v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Stroud Crop, Inc. v. HaglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cosgrove v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Plant v. WilburSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Barber v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Webber v. WebberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- J & J Bonding, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.