Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
This is an appeal from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review reversing the *493referee’s order and allowing benefits to tbe claimant on the ground that the claimant’s unemployment was not “due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature” within the meaning of section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended by the Act of August 24, 1953, P.L. 1397, section 4, 43 PS §802. From the allowance of benefits, the employer has appealed to this Court.
The claimant, Ruth H. Jarrett, had been employed by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Campbell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Means Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Elliott Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by6 opinions
- Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Herbster Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Weaver v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.